Its
aim is to reach a wise
outcome efficiently and amicably; and this requires a reasoned approach where
you neither apply, not yield, to pressure. Instead, you yield, to the force of
the argument and the evidence rather than the forcefulness of the person who is
presenting the evidence. You reason, and you are open to the reasons offered by
other; but you avoid, if possible, any ego-centric attachment to the argument.
As a result, it is not a question of my reasons versus your reasons, or my
position versus your position. Instead, we both of us simply explore the
arguments and evidence – with an open mind and without taking sides.
In
other words, the
principled bargainer tries to avoid an adversarial approach and attempts to
reach a result that is independent of the will-power of the parties concerned.
He sees himself as a problem-solver rather than an adversary or a friend; and
he attempts to be ‘hard’ on the problem yet ‘soft’ on the people in order to
avoid personal antagonism.
So
often, when we
disagree about anything, we start to talk and think in terms of my arguments rather than the arguments. Similarly, we tend to
polarize around my position – as
supported by my arguments. In no time
at all we are likely to find that the opponent has become equally entrenched
into his position and we are both
stuck. We freeze our options into just two: either my way or your way; my
position or yours; I win or you win. As soon as we move into this polarization
of options we become defensive and resistant to any of the arguments, insights or
ideas of our opponent. We might secretly recognize that much of what they say
is of value, but we will never admit this to them because this will seem to
imply that we are giving way and in danger of losing. – Alex
Howard
No comments:
Post a Comment