Democracies depend on
intellectual freedom coupled with the responsibility of individuals
and institutions to use their creative potential in morally accountable ways.
Sustained and dedicated creative intellectual exploration begets much of our
scientific and technological progress. While many emerging technologies raise
“dual use” concerns—when new technologies intended for good may be used to
cause harm—these risks alone are generally insufficient to justify limits on
intellectual freedom.
The principle of democratic
deliberation reflects an approach to collaborative decision making that
embraces respectful debate of opposing views and
active participation by citizens. It calls for individuals and their
representatives to work toward agreement whenever possible and to maintain
mutual respect when it is not. Public discussion and debate with open interchange among all
stake holders can promote the perceived legitimacy of outcomes, even if
those outcomes are unlikely to satisfy all interested parties. An inclusive
process of deliberation, informed by relevant facts and sensitive to ethical concerns, promotes an atmosphere for debate and
decision making that looks for common ground wherever possible and seeks to
cultivate mutual respect where irreconcilable differences
remain. It encourages participants to adopt a societal perspective over
individual interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment